🎯 When “Removal” Isn’t Repair: Why Our Trellises Deserve Restoration, Not Erasure

In our community, the exterior maintenance of buildings—including architectural features like wood trellises—is the responsibility of the association. These trellises, while decorative, are part of the original design, lending charm, symmetry, and character to our homes.

But recently, something troubling happened: after one resident’s trellis showed visible termite damage, the association sent someone out—not to repair it, but to saw it off and declare it wouldn’t be replaced. Why? Because the board decided trellises “attract termites.”

Let’s be clear—removal is not maintenance. And under both state law and the spirit of our own governing documents, the association is obligated to maintain the exterior of the property—not selectively erase the parts it no longer wants to care for.

📜 What the Law Says

Florida Statute 718.113 requires that associations maintain and repair the common elements—especially if those features are part of the original design. If trellises are considered “limited common elements” or even integral visual components, the association cannot just opt to remove them without proper due process.

And here’s the kicker: eliminating a common architectural feature may qualify as a material alteration, which typically requires a vote of the membership. If that didn’t happen, the board’s decision could be on shaky legal ground.

🔨 Damage Isn’t an Excuse—It’s a Call to Act

Yes, termites are a concern in Florida. But removing the feature entirely rather than repairing or replacing it sends the wrong message. What’s next—removing balconies, shutters, or fencing when they require upkeep?

As residents, we deserve not only safe and functional homes, but also one that reflects pride in its appearance and architectural integrity. It's not just about aesthetics—it’s about stewardship.

💬 What Can We Do?

1. Ask to Review the Governing Documents – Let’s verify what they say about exterior maintenance and architectural features.

2. Push for Transparency – Any decision to remove long-standing features should involve owner input.

3. Request Professional Evaluation – If termite risk is the issue, what preventative treatments or replacements (with treated materials) have been explored?

Let’s keep our community’s charm intact while protecting its value. It’s time we have this conversation—and ensure that “maintenance” doesn’t become a shortcut for “removal.”

“The Hills of Inverrary News Blog – Where Facts Live and Spin Stops.”